Martin Akerman v. National Guard Bureau
ERISA SocialSecurity DueProcess FirstAmendment HabeasCorpus
Due-process-violation
QUESTIONS PRESENTED ) 1. Does the detention of a tenured civilian federal employee under the elusive jurisdiction of the National Guard of Nevada, with false charges and without regard to statutory safeguards, constitute a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000dd(d), especially when the employee is detained based on activities protected under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)? 2. In cases involving the military detention of civilian federal employees, what are the boundaries of habeas corpus protections under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and does the denial of these protections to a non-combatant civilian by military authorities amount to an unlawful suspension or wrongful denial of habeas corpus rights? 3. Does the dismissal of a USERRA whistleblower's legal challenge to an "enemy combatant" designation, on jurisdictional grounds by the ~ United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit—which holds exclusive jurisdiction over enemy combatant status ; the statutory protections afforded under USERRA for engaging in protected activities. ; ii . TIMELINESS ; This resubmission contains a concise statement of ‘ the case, Rule 14.1(g), and is submitted to the Supreme Court of the United States in corrected form within 60 days of the date of the May 29, 2024 (Rule 14.5), as outlined in the July 9, 2024, letter from the : Clerk of the Court. Additionally, this resubmission contains a of all related orders in the