No. 24-831
Eddie Lee Evans v. James Hill, Warden
Response Waived
Tags: certificate-of-appealability due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment murder-charge supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2025-03-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a 17-year unjustified delay in filing a murder charge violated petitioner's due process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Did a 17 year unjustified delay in filing a murder charge violate petitioner’s due process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments andthe clearly established precedent of this Court suchthat a Certificate of Appealability should begranted? i
Docket Entries
2025-03-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2025-02-12
Waiver of right of respondent Warden Hixon to respond filed.
2025-02-12
Substiuting Respondent of Warden Hixon submitted.
2025-02-12
Waiver of right of respondent James Hill, Warden to respond filed.
2025-02-12
Letter filed by respondent James Hill, Warden received.
2025-01-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 7, 2025)
Attorneys
Eddie Lee Evans
Marilee Marshall — Marilee Marshall, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Marilee Marshall — Marilee Marshall, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Warden Hixon
Daniel Brian Rogers — Office of the California Attorney General, Respondent
Daniel Brian Rogers — Office of the California Attorney General, Respondent