No. 24-831

Eddie Lee Evans v. James Hill, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-02-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: certificate-of-appealability due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment murder-charge supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2025-03-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a 17-year unjustified delay in filing a murder charge violated petitioner's due process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Did a 17 year unjustified delay in filing a murder charge violate petitioner’s due process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments andthe clearly established precedent of this Court suchthat a Certificate of Appealability should begranted? i

Docket Entries

2025-03-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2025-02-12
Waiver of right of respondent Warden Hixon to respond filed.
2025-02-12
Substiuting Respondent of Warden Hixon submitted.
2025-02-12
Waiver of right of respondent James Hill, Warden to respond filed.
2025-02-12
Letter filed by respondent James Hill, Warden received.
2025-01-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 7, 2025)

Attorneys

Eddie Lee Evans
Marilee MarshallMarilee Marshall, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Marilee MarshallMarilee Marshall, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Warden Hixon
Daniel Brian RogersOffice of the California Attorney General, Respondent
Daniel Brian RogersOffice of the California Attorney General, Respondent