Whether the permanent injunction issued against Petitioner violated his First Amendment rights by constituting an unconstitutional prior restraint on speech; Whether the Colorado courts erred in failing to apply a statute of limitations to punitive contempt proceedings, contrary to due process and fundamental fairness; Whether ineffective assistance of counsel, including failure to advise Petitioner of potential sentencing consequences and failure to present key evidence, rendered the contempt conviction invalid

I. Whether the permanent injunction issued against Petitioner violated his First Amendment rights by constituting an unconstitutional prior restraint on speech. II. Whether the Colorado courts erred in failing to apply a statute of limitations to punitive contempt proceedings, contrary to due process and fundamental fairness. III. Whether ineffective assistance of counsel, including failure to advise Petitioner of potential sentencing consequences and failure to present key evidence, rendered the contempt conviction invalid.