No. 24-850
Andrew Kamal v. Femtosense, Inc., et al.
Response Waived
Tags: circuit-court constitutional-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction statutory-interpretation transfer-requirements
Key Terms:
DueProcess Patent
DueProcess Patent
Latest Conference:
2025-03-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals misapplied the Clark v. Busey transfer requirements under 28 U.S.C. § 1631 and whether the denial of transfer to the Federal Circuit violated the Petitioner's constitutional due process rights
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals misapplied the Clark v. Busey transfer requirements under 28 U.S.C. § 1631. Whether the denial of transfer to the Federal Circuit violated the Petitioner ’s constitutional due process rights. 11 STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES The Petitioner is not aware of any directly
Docket Entries
2025-03-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2025-02-12
Waiver of Femtosense, Inc., et al. of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-12
Waiver of right of respondent Femtosense, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2025-01-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 12, 2025)
Attorneys
Femtosense, Inc., et al.
Brian Robert Matsui — Morrison & Foerster LLP, Respondent
Brian Robert Matsui — Morrison & Foerster LLP, Respondent