Is an election law requiring proof that judicial candidates have state law licenses in order to qualify as 'learned in the law' unconstitutional under Marbury v. Madison?

The questions presented is: Is an election law, requiring proof that judicial candidates have state law licenses in order to qualify as “learned in the law”, pursuant to the Minnesota Constitution, unconstitutional and, therefore, invalid pursuant to Marbury v. Maddison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) and its prodigy?