Did the courts err in failing to review and address lower court findings that judgments were 'devoid of competent evidence'?

1. Did the courts err in failing to review and address lower court findings that judgments were "devoid of competent evidence"? 2. Does Rule 65 require a showing of imminent harm and reason for no notice to justify the issuance of an ex parte order without notice, and was this standard properly applied? 3. Are judgments void when contradictions exist between the district court ’s findings (indicating compliance with a doctor ’s discharge order) and the state court's findings (alleging improper removal), warranting vacatur based on fraud? 4. Does the minor ’s age affect the right to vacate a void judgment that was issued fraudulently and without jurisdiction? PARTIES TO PROCEEDING Richard R., Gelliana D. R., M.R. State of Arizona, Department of Child Safety