No. 24-894

Michelle Avery Bey v. David Harper, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-02-20
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 18-USC-1961 circuit-court district-court federal-jurisdiction racketeering statute-of-limitations
Latest Conference: 2025-04-17
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Did the United States Court of Appeal for the Tenth Circuit err in declaring that the federal questions concerning 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 and 1962 should be adjudicated by a county appraiser?

2. Does the statute of limitation for crimes in State law supersede the statute of limitation of 10 - years in federal law 18 U.S.C. § 1961 for a pattern of racketeering activity?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Tenth Circuit erred in declaring federal questions under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 and 1962 should be adjudicated by a county appraiser and whether state statute of limitations supersedes federal statute of limitations for racketeering activity

Docket Entries

2025-08-18
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-07-24
DISTRIBUTED.
2025-05-15
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-28
Waiver of Robert Burns of right to respond submitted.
2025-03-28
Waiver of right of respondent Robert Burns to respond filed.
2025-03-06
Waiver of right of respondent Donald Tracy to respond filed.
2025-03-04
Waiver of right of respondents Matthew Willard, Tyrone Garner, and Wendy M. Green to respond filed.
2025-02-26
Waiver of right of respondent David Harper to respond filed.
2024-11-09

Attorneys

David Harper
Adam D. KingKansas Department of Revenue, Respondent
Donald Tracy
Anthony A. SteinThe Stein Law Firm, Respondent
Matthew Willard, Tyrone Garner, and Wendy M. Green
Daniel E. KuhnUnified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Respondent
Michelle A. Bey
Michelle Avery Bey — Petitioner
Robert Burns
Gregory P. GoheenMcAnany, Van Cleave &Phillips,P.A., Respondent