Whether the district court and circuit court improperly dismissed Qiu's Title VII complaint by declining to consider her supporting email evidence and violating her due process rights

Qiu the accented U.S. citizen of origin of China applied for employment with Oldham. Principal Woosley held Qiu waiting to search for Qiu ’s skills after the interview, having no questions about Qiu ’s qualifications. Woosley kicked Qiu off waiting when annoyed by Qiu ’s emails asking to be hired. Qiu sued Oldham under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 based on her race, color, and national origin. Qiu ’s complaint covered the four elements of 411 U.S. at 802. Oldham filed the motion to dismiss Qiu ’s complaint. Qiu responded with the attachment of the email exchanges of Woosley and Qiu to support the facts in her complaint. The district court rejected Qiu ’s evidence of the emails attached to her response. The district court dismissed Qiu ’s complaint, and the circuit court affirmed the dismissal. 1. Should the evidence attached to the response to the motion to dismiss be declined? 2. Does the complaint meet the standard “state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face ” when setting up the prima facie under 411 U.S. at 802? 3. Did the judges violate Qiu ’s Constitutional right to due process and equal protection of the laws in Section 1 of Amendment XIV? Were the judges against the Rule of Law? LIST OF PROCEDURE Wei Qiu v. Board of Education of Oldham County Schools, KY, 3:22 cv 00383, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. Judgment entered on 03/02/23; 59(e) was denied on 03/20/24. Wei Qiu v. Board of Education of Oldham County, KY 24-53o6, U. S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit. Judgment entered on Oct. 11, 2024; Petition to rehear to the en banc was denied on Nov. 18, 2024. ii