No. 24-901

Kaeun Kim v. United States District Court for the District of New Jersey

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2025-02-20
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: constitutional-limits due-process judicial-bias mandamus obstruction-of-justice prosecutorial-immunity
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2025-06-18 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Third Circuit erred in denying the Petition for Writ of Mandamus despite compelling evidence of judicial bias, obstruction of justice, and denial of due process in the lower courts

Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether the Third Circuit erred in denying the Petition for Writ of Mandamus despite compelling evidence of judicial bias, obstruction of justice, and denial of due process in the lower courts. 2. Whether the Third Circuit ’s decision improperly expands judicial and prosecutorial immunity beyond constitutional limits, shielding government officials who allegedly engaged in fabrication of evidence and procedural misconduct from accountability. 3. Whether the failure to consider fundamental due process violations in an ongoing criminal matter necessitates review by this Court to prevent a grave miscarriage of justice.

Docket Entries

2025-06-23
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2025.
2025-05-07
2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-19
Waiver of right of respondents Mark Ali & Mira Ohm to respond filed.
2025-02-10

Attorneys

Kaeun Kim
Kaeun Kim — Petitioner
Kaeun Kim — Petitioner
Mark Ali & Mira Ohm
Leo R. BoerstoelOffice of the New Jersey Attorney General, Respondent
Leo R. BoerstoelOffice of the New Jersey Attorney General, Respondent
USDC NJ
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent