No. 24-912
Earl Casperson Meggison v. Florida
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure ex-post-facto removal-provision sex-offender-registration state-courts
Latest Conference:
2025-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should resolve the question of whether applying a more onerous sex offender registration removal provision violates ex post facto constitutional principles
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : i A. QUESTION PR ESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Court shoul d resol ve the following questi on for which the state courts are split: is it a violation of consti tutional ex post facto principles to apply the current – and more onero us – removal provi sion of a state’s sex offender registrati on statute to a peti tioner seeki ng removal from the regi stry. ii B. PAR TIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identi fied in the style of the case. iii C.
Docket Entries
2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-24
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2025-02-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 27, 2025)
2025-01-15
Application (24A695) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until February 20, 2025.
2025-01-10
Application (24A695) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 20, 2025 to February 20, 2025, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Earl Casperson Meggison
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Florida
Kristen Lynn Davenport — Suite 500, Respondent