No. 24-927
Brian Burke v. Housing and Services, Inc., et al.
Response Waived
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration ERISA DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-04-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can Standing for a constitutional question (NYS Labor Law 190) be defeated by Judicial Error? Can RICO claims be defeated by Judicial Error, without apparent remedy?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
1) Can Standing for a constitutional question (NYS Labor Law 190) be defeated by Judicial Error 2) Can RICO claims be defeated by Judicial Error, without apparent remedy?
Docket Entries
2025-04-28
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/25/2025.
2025-04-01
Waiver of New York City Transit Authority of right to respond submitted.
2025-04-01
Waiver of right of respondent New York City Transit Authority to respond filed.
2025-03-28
Waiver of NYS Attorney General; City University of NY of right to respond submitted.
2025-03-28
Waiver of right of respondents NYS Attorney General; City University of NY to respond filed.
2025-03-20
Waiver of right of respondents Housing and Services, Inc., Kenmore Housing Development Fund Corporation, Kenmore Housing Corporation and Kenmore Associate, L.P. to respond filed.
2024-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 28, 2025)
Attorneys
Housing and Services, Inc., Kenmore Housing Development Fund Corporation, Kenmore Housing Corporation and Kenmore Associate, L.P.
Jeffrey N. Rejan — Malapero Prisco & Klauber, LLP, Respondent
Jeffrey N. Rejan — Malapero Prisco & Klauber, LLP, Respondent
New York City Transit Authority
Robert Kenneth Drinan — New York City Transit Authority, Respondent
Robert Kenneth Drinan — New York City Transit Authority, Respondent
NYS Attorney General; City University of NY
Barbara Dale Underwood — Solicitor General, Respondent
Barbara Dale Underwood — Solicitor General, Respondent