Olympic Collection, Inc., et al. v. Aklilu Yohannes
DueProcess
Whether an interlocutory order and failure to meet Rule 10 considerations warrant certiorari review
Whether Petitioner Akilu Yohannes’s (“Yohannes”) challenge to an interlocutory order provides a basis for certiorari. Wh e t h e r c e rti o r ari s h o ul d b e gr an te d w h e r e considerations governing review on certiorari under Rule 10 have not been met. The following questions for a conditional cross-petition of Respondents Olympic Collection, Inc., Farooq Ansari, Susan Cable, and Norman Martin (collectively “Olympic”), apply only if certiorari were to be granted. Whether Olympic is a private collection agency that is not a state actor for purposes of a due process claim. Whether an as-applied due process claim can be brought based on an alleged failure to follow a state statute. Whether this lawsuit should be dismissed if the sole remaining claim is dismissed. Whether the Court should grant certiorari on crosspetition to determine to answer the above questions.