Whether the Eleventh Circuit improperly restricted expert testimony on sexual interest in children contrary to the Supreme Court's recent decision in Diaz v. United States

Did the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit fail to follow this Court’s recent decision in Diaz v. United States , 602 U.S. 526 (2024) in favor of their own precedent on the scope of expert testimony under Federal Rules of E vi d e n ce 7 04(b ) in h o l din g tha t a ps y c h o l o gi cal expe rt could not give an opinion in a prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) that the defendant did not generally have sexual interest in children?