Whether a pro se litigant's failure to pay filing fees and comply with procedural rules constitutes an unconstitutional deprivation of access to courts and due process

No question identified. : cots Confinids Kim Ferree sa three months, TRS iMpedas He legal mer! proess and dapcives him oF Fimaly Coplas and Ha Word proeassing of Macessory dacunects to He Filnis oF mottiple Motions Te Extend Tine, No corPuler acest i confinement BAppallant] Pah toners cose ts extraordinary wrth marPand overwhalmuas ,Sopportins eviderce Deprivotions of Consttotionel Rug Ke toy Spaedy Trrel , exonareing porehes ed records, Sudgments of ceguittal and release from custody, are willfully Occuring . G.The_Spaeifié [Ss0es ore detailed A The Tritial BreF oF a casa Aeemissed by Fasdvlect curs of stetotery law equiring He pre-pay mat of Fling Fees wlan Hus Pot Hone t€ enti Had ardits already Proceeding Pro~se 1A Farmer Pauperct Thus Awersionory dace | techs 15 anly to prevent aceass te Courts andthe submursion of dacomaats challenging he Steted assiiileted procacs aunthont ting Floridar rochtety dacssis dwctring. (see ado seh Tackel Rref) A, Appel lent /Pertctronar has newer hod Ack day in court. Hehas been deprived OPQ true Cenhost oF tHe mertt andi an ofRiaal jury trial . No rascnable findar of Ret Could over-Find hur guilty. Overwhelmuis evidence submis foas have been dig regavehed Supportag hw Cheuais fer edrasic tad, Sods es rulings Prove_ enmircd vctert resus fo address and correct Clear, Prolong ed ave rte, deharctien 42 -Thi Court dusted Aus Petter Fon nat of Crhorart, cose $20 ~ 616R, Ho. foretold thet tHe federd judges would Pefise fe givehim fae relief, Now, & yaoes leder ke. preys thes court wlll hear and Fad his Cause uf fir Ha just preservation of Ameriedn Libemty aS opposed ty He tyramice| Acorearestion of innocort erizens. Thi Cork must Aoaor Ha spit oF liberty According ly , Appal lant] Petitioner requorts 60 days axteacion oie ty cide uetly Prepare Avs Potton Kor Carton aad prys tha couch it sympatat fo is couse Faleing Todiclal Notice of Ha medi cious achors of those who profer oppression over justice, nN He Founding ~dof S~ poe CERTLETCATE oF SERVICE This isto ah Hat He res oire Motion For Berrios OF Tint Was Mailed to He doinat Sede of throug h CouAsel » Florida Atty ° Mere Pi-oa TEtahe ray Gerure| phe Gop'ote | ANAS See a0 32399 on Hhis OF Apatl 20a. fan Signed ¢ Chat Dip Rebs anes CORRECTIONAL STITUTION £7223 M29 | FOR MAILING | | ~3oPs. USCA11 Case: 25-10142 Document:2 Date Filed: 02/05/2025 Page: 2 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 25-10142-F CHRISTOPHER J. RAHAIM, Plaintiff Appellant, versus CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE, SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, STATE ATTORNEY, THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, Pinellas County, OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY, Pinellas County STATE OF FLORIDA, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Christopher J. Rahaim has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court and file a Transcript Order Form and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and