Irina Collier v. Donald J. Trump
Whether a notice of appeal filed beyond the 60-day period established in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1)(B) can be deemed timely when the appellant claims extenuating circumstances
No question identified. : United States Court of Appeals For THE DistRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 24-7018 September Term, 2023 1:23-cv-01820-UNA Filed On: May 1, 2024 Irina Collier, and for all similarly situated, Appellant v. Donald J. Trump, Appellee BEFORE: Rao, Walker, and Garcia, Circuit Judges ORDER Upon consideration of the court's order to show cause filed on February 21, 2024, the response thereto, and appellant's additional motions, itis _ORDERED that the order to show cause be discharged. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's motions be denied. Appellant has not demonstrated that she is entitled to the relief requested. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed as untimely. Appellant's February 8, 2024 notice of appeal was filed beyond the 60-day period established in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1)(B), with respect to both the district court’s original issuance of its dismissal order on July 12, 2023, and its re-issuance of that order on October 10, 2023. The timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement. See Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 209 (2007). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution United States Court of Appeals FoR THE DisTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 24-7018 September Term, 2023 of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: /s/ Selena R. Gancasz Deputy Clerk Page 2