Whether a state supreme court's unanimous denial of a petition for writ of certiorari precludes subsequent motions for reargument or stay of enforcement

No question identified. : Reasons For Granting Extension of time for filing Petition The specific reasons why an extension of time is justified are due to petitioners needing to get acclimated to the supreme court rules and perform legal research properly to prepare for two petitions to meet and exceed requirements stipulated in Supreme Court Rule 10. Other specific reasons why an extension of time is justified is stated in the statute 28 U.S.C. 2101(c) and Supreme Court Rules 13 section 5. Section (c ) and Rule 30 section 2. Extending the deadline would give him the best opportunity to prepare both petitions showing a state court of last resort decision on an important federal question conflicts with the United States Court of appeals and also showing that a state court has decided an important question of federal law that has not been but should be settled by this court and conflicts with relevant prior decisions of this court. Petitioner would show how his petitions are extremely important not only to the petitioner but to others similarly situated and in the nation's public interest. Conclusion Petitioner requests this court to extend the time to file his petitions because of the preparation needed for both petitions and the fact his request was made within the 10 day time frame and is deemed appropriate under supreme court rules 13.5,30.2 and statute 28 U.S.C. 2101(c) Respectfully Submitted, Elbert Gaynor Address TBA 202-300-3874 Gregory Hilton, Cle Supreme Court of Maryla 2/26/2025 9:13 4 IN THE ELBERT GAYNOR * SUPREME COURT y * OF MARYLAND * Petition No. 138 EXTENDED STAY AMERICA + September Term, 2024 ~ Cit. Ct. No. C-13-CV-23-000701) ORDER Upon consideration of the Motion for Stay of Enforcement, Motion Application for Reargument, and Request for Waiver of Prepaid Appellate Costs, it is this 26" day of February 2025, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, ORDERED that, as the September 25, 2024 order denying the petition for writ of certiorari was by unanimous vote of the Court, the motion for reargument is denied; and it is further ORDERED that the motion to stay is denied; and it is further ORDERED that the Request for Waiver of Prepaid Appellate Costs is granted. /s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Elbert GaynorPETITIONER vs Extended Stay RESPONDENT(S) PROOF OF SERVICE |, Elbert Gaynor, swear or declare that on this date, May 13, 2025, as required by Supreme Court Rule 29 section 3 and section 5 (a) and Rule 22. | have served a copy of the APPLICATION TO AN INDIVIDUAL JUSTICE on each party’s counsel Ms Chic and Mr Harris by personal delivery. Elbert Gaynor certifies under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. The names and addresses of those served are Ms. Chick and Mr Harris at the address of 100 Light Street Suite 1300 Baltimore MD 21202 410-779-3910. | declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 13, 2025 (Signature)