Whether the First Amendment protects a prisoner's right to timely and unimpeded legal mail communication with courts and legal counsel
No question identified. : 3RAUW THe Apes} (72h . ‘ Bhiel Themeson, April (TE Request For Tine Extension Page a ae HL Photo copied that ceguest, ancl the on Suncat March Aydoas F sent __ Byram on @orai) "prisoner to Stace ; hotifying her thet © had oute bound __18gol mail C@guicing indigent Stamps, ond postiase March, 2,A%AS “To met with By tam, Ceceived the stamps and gealed the 1att er and She _ they Post@el ite At this point % need te explain aut-bound legal mail preceduces for indigent prisoners, _ : a = — L® preparelcompiete the legal dacumentation to be. seat. t then netigy By rom by “Shape Email” that I need postage § tam Sy photo copying y __ and posting fer out-beund legal mail,AY this point ja hime Eno longer have any contre! aver the. physical posting of thet mail, Oace TL acti¢y _ ___ Byram itis upto Gtace Scheduling Javatinbility fec photo copylagn Stamps, and Physic al posting Chy Stage) of that mailé I believe that the dots _T_ notify Bycam of my need to Send out legal mail meets the CAE e re _ of the "Pelisoner Mailbox Rulet This ts the Standard on ~golng Procedures) Byron posted thet teguest to your office on March 3 in Pee ___Tnstitutlenal mailbox, and it was delivered te the Post Office March Ye ___ Because of the on-goiag, blatant interferences of my legal mailand the demands of due dates T keep a sharp @ye on dates of mail After waiting oo Kh ree Weeks for a cesponse from your of flea (1 Well beyong om Peasnalle __ Span of timed E contacted Casemanager Smillie about the situctien, For. Several days he wason. the WEB site for the Supeene Court asweilas On the phon, and could-€ind nothing out Smillie was guite active ia uw AAvestigeting the sthuction particularly with Byram, TE was alse gait active, and vocal, and public, sneluding about the erimiaal complaint L Was Filing withthe Offre OF Laspector Generis “Horace and my feeuest that this tashitutlen’s admisistration be noti¢red abeut it. Sard complaint was filed and publisizeel Thursday =Friday March Areas _ The -fellowlag Monday, March 31T was Sucldeniy called be the Mail Room +o Sign fer incoming Iegal mail, T am otbachtog o& Photo copy af the face of The ineomilag envelope, Several polats immediately ___ 2 The stomping of timesldares of processing in-comlay Jegal niall show _E ceceived it March 21,2085, Er does not show whe precessed delivering it tome, 2Tt does not Show when it was received trom the US Postal Service. P It dees not Show whe received st andwhen jathe Mall Roome BRAUM THempsen’ Apes th Request For Time Extension ee PE+ does Showa postmark dete of March 19) Roas arn > T+ does not take fifteen clays fer the Supreme Couch te feceive and process & fequest for instructions on a Writ o¢ Certiofats CMaceh Ua mMarch 1%) _ YI+ dees not take +wetve days Lor Mail from the Supreme Court fo reach the institution and b& deliverte po the pCismes, SThe absurdity of a simple requestor information and Cespense. . _ berweera an’ Eines lastituttes and Washington Oc taleing thetol of twenty-seven days Cond thea ealy after severe complaint) blantantly exposes the wroigful interfertace and delay of my [egal ail ley state of this rastitutlop, : S r+ has also created the Ceality that by not receiving the instructions from the Supreme Court uatil March Baoas y Path ee than having ninety days to prepare ayel ele a Petition _ Fer Writ of Certioraci,T was given only twenty. 2ight days, have mod? ao very serious OFfort these Past wo Weelts 7 terry te make rhe Apo a7 aed § cléacliag. There is simply £2. way DF can de So while completing the cull Cogul cements of the Petition: Dam therefore Peguastin ping an exteasion of thread uieeks Betta. fer Silag the. Pebitien tec what Tm believe is cl wo RAM