No. 24A1246

Perteacher Drone v. Robert J. Conrad, Director, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-06-17
Status: Presumed Complete
Type: A
Tags: appeal-deadline federal-rules-appellate-procedure jurisdictional-requirement notice-of-appeal subject-matter-jurisdiction timely-filing
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a federal court can dismiss an appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction when a notice of appeal is filed well beyond the prescribed 60-day statutory deadline

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : USCA4 Appeal: 24-1935 Doc: 15-2 Filed: 03/31/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 Total Pages:(4 of 5) FILED: March 31, 2025 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1935 (3:17-cv-00332-JAG) PERTEACHER DRONE Plaintiff Appellant v. JAMES DUFF, Director, Administrative Office of the United States Courts; REBECCA BEACH SMITH, Chief Judge, in her official capacity as United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, MARY ANNE VOGEL, then Chief United States Probation Officer, in her official capacity as Chief Probation Officer for the Eastern District of Virginia; MARY K. FARASHAHI, then Acting Chief Probation Officer, in her official capacity as Chief Probation Officer; VELMA K. BENNS, In his individual capacity as Supervisory Probation Officer; DANIEL GUERTLER, in his individual and official capacity as Supervisory Probation Officer; DEBORAH CRAMER, in her official capacity as Employment Dispute Resolution Coordinator Defendants Appellees JUDGMENT In accordance with the decision of this court, this appeal is dismissed. This judgment shall take effect upon issuance of this court's mandate in USCA4 Appeal: 24-1935 Doc: 15-2 Filed: 03/31/2025 Pg: 2of2 Total Pages:(5 of 5) accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 41. /s| NWAMAKA ANOWI, CLERK USGA4 Appeal: 24-1959 voc: 14 FEO: UVSIS 1Z2UZ9 rg. | O15 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1935 PERTEACHER DRONE, Plaintiff Appellant, v. JAMES DUFF, Director, Administrative Office of the United States Courts; REBECCA BEACH SMITH, Chief Judge, in her official capacity as United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia; MARY ANNE VOGEL, then Chief United States Probation Officer, in her official capacity as Chief Probation Officer for the Eastern District of Virginia, MARY K. FARASHAHI, then Acting Chief Probation Officer, in her official capacity as Chief Probation Officer; VELMA K. BENNS, In his individual capacity as Supervisory Probation Officer; DANIEL GUERTLER, in his individual and official capacity as Supervisory Probation Officer; DEBORAH CRAMER, in her official capacity as Employment Dispute Resolution Coordinator, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-00332-JAG) Submitted: March 27, 2025 Decided: March 31, 2025 Before THACKER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. USUA4 Appeal: 24-1959 VOC: 14 FUE: US/S 1/24UZ9 rg: 5 01S PER CURIAM: Perteacher Drone seeks to appeal the district court’s granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss Drone’s wrongful termination claims. We dismiss the appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party in a civil case, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court entered its order on December 29, 2017, and the appeal period expired on February 27, 2018. Drone filed the notice of appeal on August 29, 2024. Because Drone failed to file a timely notice of appeal and failed to obtain permission to extend or reopen the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We also deny Drone’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED Additional material from this filing is available in t

Docket Entries

2025-06-20
Application (24A1246) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until August 28, 2025.
2025-06-09
Application (24A1246) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 29, 2025 to August 28, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Conrad, Robert J., et al.
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
Perteacher Drone
Perteacher Drone — Petitioner
Perteacher Drone — Petitioner