Whether a bankruptcy court properly dismissed a complaint with prejudice when the claims were potentially viable and not barred by public policy or statute of limitations

No question identified. : August 1,2025 the decision of the Court of Appeals is attached. Jurisdiction of this court to review the Order and Judgements being invoked Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1254 (1). The Petition for Certiorari raises serious questions as to whether the bankruptcy court err in dismissing the SAC with prejudice?The Adversary Proceeding presented viable claims that were not barred by Public policy or the statute of limitations.The orders rightfully should be reversed and the adversary proceeding reinstated. Reasons for Granting an Extension of Time Petitioner seeks an extension of time to file an application for a Writ Of Certiorari because he is a senior citizen,heart patient and pro se, the issues are complex,no prejudice or significant delay will result from the granting of this brief extension. Realistically, the thirty day extension is needed to properly finalize and submit a pro se Writ of Certiorari. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons,the time to file a petition for a Writ Of Certiorari in this matter should be extended for thirty days to and including August 1,2025 Dated: June 23,2025 Respectfully Submitted, David C.Kwok 1210 S.Gladys Avenue. San Gabriel,Calif.91776 Tel: 626-898-2177