Question not identified.

No question identified. : Month/Days | Sun | Mon Tue | Wed Th Fri Sat 2 June 8 9 15 16 22 23 29 30 20 days (June 19, 2025 is holiday and weekends are not included because court is clased) | Month/Days| Sun [Mon | Tue Wed Th Fri Sat [1 2 3 4 5 July 6 7 [8 9 10 u 12 13 14 15 16 17 ig 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Even if all days are counted included weekends, holidays, the motion for time extension to prepare and file writ of certiorari is requested within the 10 days minimum requirement, wherefore this request is in compliance with supreme court rule 30 Story line On April 1, 2025, United States Court of Appeals for the first Circuit three panel judges; Chief Justice David J Barron, Judge William J. Kayatta Jr. and Judge Gustavo Antonio Gelpi Jr. agreed to issue a summary affirmative judgement without opinion, nor memorandum and order. On or about April 14, 2025, AppellantPlaintiff file a notice to appeal the court summary judgement. The Clerk of court; Ms, Anastasia Dubrosvsky return appellant-plaintiff notice of appeal on April 23, 2025 without acting on it. The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit then issued a formal mandate on April 23, 2025.On May 8, 2025, appellant file motion to stay of mandate asserting that the court mandate issued on April 23, 2025 conflict with FRAP 41(b). Furthermore per FRAP 41(d) a motion for rehearing may be filed within 45 days for cases involving government entity or official. This case meet such a requirement because Lakeville Municipal Police Department is a government entity, Massachusetts Attorney General the whale in the room meet that requirement, Massachusetts State Police meet that requirement to highlight a few. On or about May 8, 2025, appellant also file a motion for time extension to petition for rehearing with the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. The clerk of court for the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 2 prepared, signed and docketed the court order issued on June 10, 2025 denying appellant motion for stay of mandate. In accordant with supreme court of united states rule 30, petitioner a non-lawyer hereby request for an extension of sixty days to prepare and file a writ of certiorari . The grounds for extension of time to prepare and file the writ of certiorari is stated as follows; Housing/Homeless: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issue the judgement on April 1, 2025 and on April 11, 2025, the owner of the hostel on 13 school street Everett Massachusetts Petitioner was staying gave two days’ notice for Petitioner to leave. Having been on this hostel for over a year Petitioner request for a month to leave which was granted. Petitioner has been living on this hostel for lack of housing. This hostel on 13 School Street Everett Massachusetts was used as Petitioner confinement/prison. (See the exhibit images below); it is difficult to put that into words. Petitioner homelessness and housing insecurity experience in Boston Massachusetts, in Washington DC and in Virginia create a profound negative impact on Petitioner overall wellbeing. Living in the street for a long time means one is defend less, living in one of the most unfavorable conditions, deprive a person right to enjoy life, harm a person dignity, exacerbate social isolation, create embarrassment, shame and societal stigma. Petition is subjected into this homeless cruel conditions because of the applications that were submitted to the court and the court knowingly approved those applications and willfully refuse to accord Petitioner a hearing. For instance Petitioner homelessness in Boston has resulted to arrest by Logan State Police, detained and charge with criminal offenses and issued arrest warrant. Private actors like doordash and others use Petitioner homelessness to target him on public places. Courts judges used Petitioner homelessness to subject him to prolong custodian investigations. Petitioner suffer skin rash (see the imag