No. 24A173
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al. v. Missouri, et al.
Amici (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-law education-department income-contingent-repayment major-questions-doctrine statutory-interpretation student-loans
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Department of Education exceeded its statutory authority in modifying income-contingent student loan repayment plans through a rule that changes payment calculations and forgiveness timelines
Docket Entries
2024-08-28
Application (24A173) referred to the Court.
2024-08-28
Application (24A173) to vacate injunction presented to Justice Kavanaugh and by him referred to the Court is denied. The Court expects that the Court of Appeals will render its decision with appropriate dispatch.
2024-08-20
Reply of Joseph. R. Biden, Jr. et al. in support of application submitted.
2024-08-20
Reply of applicants Joseph. R. Biden, Jr. et al. filed.
2024-08-19
Response of State of Missouri, et al. to application submitted.
2024-08-19
Amicus brief of New Civil Liberties Alliance submitted.
2024-08-19
Response to application from respondents Missouri, et al. filed.
2024-08-19
Brief amicus curiae of New Civil Liberties Alliance filed.
2024-08-19
Brief amici curiae of Texas, Alaska, and South Carolina filed.
2024-08-13
Application (24A173) to vacate injunction pending appeal, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
2024-08-13
Response to application (24A173) requested by Justice Kavanaugh, due by 4pm (EDT) on August 19, 2024.
Attorneys
Joseph. R. Biden, Jr. et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Petitioner
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Petitioner
New Civil Liberties Alliance
Sheng Tao Li — New Civil Liberties Alliance, Amicus
Sheng Tao Li — New Civil Liberties Alliance, Amicus
State of Missouri, et al.
Joshua Michael Divine — Office of the Missouri Attorney General, Respondent
Joshua Michael Divine — Office of the Missouri Attorney General, Respondent
Texas, Alaska, and South Carolina