No. 24A263

Marquice D. Robinson v. Michael Holman, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-09-13
Status: Denied
Type: A
Tags: circuit-split court-of-appeals federal-jurisdiction legal-standards supervisory-power writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)

The first question is whether The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals (The Eleventh Circuit) erred in holding in conflict with The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that a violation of a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) is not an adverse employment action.

The second question is whether The Eleventh Circuit erred in holding in conflict with The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals (The Federal Circuit) that Judgment on the pleadings can be granted when there are material facts in dispute.

The third question is whether The Eleventh Circuit has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings when it entered a decision on a state law claim in conflict with the state's law.

The fourth question is whether The El

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a federal court of appeals improperly deviated from established legal standards in a manner that could create a circuit split warranting Supreme Court review

Docket Entries

2024-10-11
Application (24A263) denied by Justice Thomas.
2024-10-07
Application (24A263) to extend further the time from November 9, 2024 to December 9, 2024, submitted to Justice Thomas.
2024-09-13
Application (24A263) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until November 9, 2024.
2024-09-10
Application (24A263) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 10, 2024 to December 9, 2024, submitted to Justice Thomas.

Attorneys

Marquice D. Robinson
Marquice Robinson — Petitioner
United States Marshals Service
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent