No. 24A419

Cynthia Davis, Warden v. David M. Smith

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: N/A
Status: Presumed Complete
Type: A
Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-conviction federal-review habeas-corpus mandate sixth-circuit state-court
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Sixth Circuit improperly interpreted federal habeas corpus standards for reviewing state court criminal convictions

Docket Entries

2024-11-22
Application (24A419) referred to the Court.
2024-11-22
Application (24A419) for stay and recall of the mandate presented to Justice Kavanaugh and by him referred to the Court is denied.
2024-11-12
Response to application from respondent David M. Smith filed.
2024-11-04
Response to application (24A419) requested by Justice Kavanaugh, due by 4 p.m. (EST), on November 12, 2024.
2024-10-24
Application (24A419) for a stay and recall of the mandate, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.

Attorneys

Cynthia Davis, Warden
Thomas Elliot GaiserOffice of the Ohio Attorney General, Petitioner
Thomas Elliot GaiserOffice of the Ohio Attorney General, Petitioner
David M. Smith
Sarah Marie KonskyJenner & Block Supreme Court and Appellate Clinic, Respondent
Sarah Marie KonskyJenner & Block Supreme Court and Appellate Clinic, Respondent