No. 24A487

City of Los Angeles, California, et al. v. Hasmik Jasmine Chinaryan, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem for NEC, a Minor, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-11-15
Status: Presumed Complete
Type: A
Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-violations excessive-force law-enforcement municipal-liability ninth-circuit
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a municipality and its employees can be held liable for alleged constitutional violations arising from a law enforcement encounter involving potential excessive force or civil rights claims

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : To the Honorable Elena Kagan, as Circuit Justice for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Pursuant to this Court's Rule 13.5, Petitioners the City of Los Angeles, Ramiro Gonzalez, Fred Cueto, Mario Menses, Brittany Primo, Eduardo Piche, Daniel Gayton, Airam Potter, and Rodrigo Soria respectfully request a 60-day extension, to March 3, 2025, to file their Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court seeking review of the Ninth Circuit ruling in Chinaryan, v. City of Los Angeles, Nos. 21-56237, 22-55168 (9th Cir. 2024). The Ninth Circuit issued its opinion on August 14, 2024 (

Docket Entries

2024-11-15
Application (24A487) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 2, 2025.
2024-11-13
Application (24A487) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 1, 2025 to March 2, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

City of Los Angeles, et al.
Michael Martin WalshCity of Los Angeles, City Attorney, Petitioner
Michael Martin WalshCity of Los Angeles, City Attorney, Petitioner