Whether pro se litigants can overcome procedural deficiencies in a federal civil rights action when alleging systemic filing interference

No question identified. : REQUEST FOR ETENTION TO CORRECT FILIMG PETITIONERS ARE IN NEED OF MORE TIME FOR FILING. We need the extra time due to Our having interference with our filing these documents and the unusual document need to file And finances to complete. If we are granted more time, we can definitely correct our filing Requirements. Me. af 4 gy ‘al 2 Yi f f es Conerly Carina Conerly Marilyn Tillman-Conerly Va December 22, 2024 NOT FOR PUBLICATION FI L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER. CLERK CARINA CONERLY; JAMES CONERLY; | No. 23-15297 MARILYN TILLMAN-CONERLY; M. T., a minor, D.C. No. MEMORANDUM” v. SHARIF R. TARPIN, et al., Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 17, 2024" Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. Carina Conerly, James Conerly, and Marilyn Tillman-Conerly appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing their action alleging federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Puri v. Khalsa, 844 F.3d 1152, 1157 (9th Cir. 2017) (dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil . . This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Additional material from this filing is available in the Clerk’s Office.