No. 24A690
Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. v. Amie Drammeh, et al.
Tags: certification erie-doctrine federal-diversity judicial-prediction ninth-circuit state-tort-law
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether federal courts of appeals may predict novel state law tort theories in diversity cases when the state supreme court has declined to certify or adopt such theories, in potential violation of Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins
Docket Entries
2025-01-15
Application (24A690) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 21, 2025.
2025-01-14
Response of Amie Drammeh, Yusepha Ceesay, and Maram Ceesay to application submitted.
2025-01-14
Response to application from respondent Amie Drammeh, Yusepha Ceesay, and Maram Ceesay filed.
2025-01-10
Application (24A690) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 22, 2025 to March 21, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Amie Drammeh, Yusepha Ceesay, and Maram Ceesay
Brent Marcus Rosenthal — Law Office of Brent M. Rosenthal, PC, Respondent
Brent Marcus Rosenthal — Law Office of Brent M. Rosenthal, PC, Respondent
Uber Technologies, Inc., et al.
Michael Robert Huston — Perkins Coie LLP, Petitioner
Michael Robert Huston — Perkins Coie LLP, Petitioner