No. 24A934

Jay Christensen, et al. v. Shawn Sheltra

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-03-28
Status: Presumed Complete
Type: A
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-exhaustion continuing-violation-exception inmate-litigation ninth-circuit-split prison-litigation-reform-act ross-v-blake
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Prison Litigation Reform Act's administrative exhaustion requirement under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) permits a continuing violation exception to exhaustion, and if so, what is the proper scope of such exception consistent with Ross v. Blake

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : To the Honorable Elena Kagan, Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court and Circuit Justice to the Ninth Circuit: Pursuant to Rule 13.5, Rule 22, and Rule 30 of the Rules of this Court and 28 U.S.C. § 2101(c), Applicants Jay Christensen, David Dietz, and Benjamin Frahs respectfully request a 30-day extension of their deadline to file a petition for a writ of certiorari, from March 31 to April 30. Pursuant to Rule 13.5, this request is filed at least 10 days before the current due date, and the Court’s jurisdiction is invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1). The Ninth Circuit’s decision is attached to this application and reported at Sheltra v. Christensen, 124 F.4th 1195 (9th Cir. 2024). It applies, and expands, a continuing violation exception to administrative exhaustion requirements under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Its broad statement of the exception splits from the narrower exception applied by other circuits, and to apply such an exception at all violates the PLRA and this Court’s decision in Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. 632 (2016). A 30-day extension is necessary due to the heavy caseload of undersigned counsel overlapping with preparation of a petition for writ of certiorari. Counsel of record is preparing for oral argument in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in March and in the Idaho Supreme Court in April. Counsel is also assisting with briefing due in the Ninth Circuit and Idaho Supreme Court due throughout the month of April and with the requested Response to Petition for Writ of Certiorari in this Court due on April 9, 2025, in Wilson v. Idaho, No. 24-853. Accordingly, Applicants request the Court enter an order extending the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari to April 30, 2025. Respectfully submitted, RAUL R. LABRADOR ALAN M. HURST Attorney General Solicitor General IDAHO OFFICE OF THE Counsel of Record ATTORNEY GENERAL MICHAEL A. ZARIAN 700 W. Jefferson St. Deputy Solicitor General Suite 210 AARON M. GREEN Boise, ID 83720 (208) 334-2400 alan. hurst@ag.idaho.gov Deputy Attorney General Counsel for Applicants March 21, 2025

Docket Entries

2025-03-28
Application (24A934) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until April 30, 2025.
2025-03-21
Application (24A934) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 31, 2025 to April 30, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Jay Christensen, et al.
Alan Michael HurstIdaho Office of the Attorney General, Petitioner
Alan Michael HurstIdaho Office of the Attorney General, Petitioner