No. 25-1071
Peter Williams v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-procedure-act clean-air-act finality nondiscretionary-action petition-for-review res-judicata
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether this Court's supervising decision on nonjurisdictional 60-day windows bars res judicata?
2. Whether review of action unlawfully withheld remains under §307(b)(1) or moved to §304(a)(2)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the D.C. Circuit erred in finding jurisdiction barred by the Clean Air Act's 60-day petition-for-review window when petitioner timely sought administrative reconsideration of EPA's factually and legally erroneous denial of a program application, and whether review of unlawfully withheld agency action remains under §307(b)(1) or has been displaced by §304(a)(2)
Docket Entries
2026-04-01
Waiver of Environmental Protection Agency of right to respond submitted.
2026-04-01
Waiver of right of respondent Environmental Protection Agency to respond filed.
2026-03-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 10, 2026)
2026-01-05
Application (25A757) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until March 9, 2026.
2026-01-01
Errata of Peter Williams submitted.
2025-12-28
Application (25A757) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 8, 2026 to March 9, 2026, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Environmental Protection Agency
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Peter Williams
Lawrence J. Joseph — Law Office of Lawrence J. Joseph, Petitioner