No. 25-1081
Wuendy Celeny Zapet-Alvarado, et al. v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney General
Tags: administrative-law asylum extraordinary-circumstances immigration-law judicial-review statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the application of 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(D)'s "changed . . . or extraordinary circumstances" exception to undisputed facts presents a "question[] of law" courts have jurisdiction to review under § 1252(a)(2)(D).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the application of 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(D)'s 'changed . . . or extraordinary circumstances' exception to undisputed facts presents a 'question[] of law' courts have jurisdiction to review under § 1252(a)(2)(D)
Docket Entries
2026-04-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 13, 2026.
2026-04-08
Motion of Bondi, Pamela for an extension of time submitted.
2026-04-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 13, 2026 to May 13, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2026-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 13, 2026)
2026-03-11
Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.
Attorneys
Bondi, Pamela
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Wuendy Celeny Zapet-Alvarado