1. Did the District Court unreasonably deny Plaintiff's arguments that newly discovered evidence should require a) reversal of prior dismissal; and b) allow for discovery on the newly discovered evidence?

2. Did the District Court err by refusing to a) address the recusal/disqualification motion by labeling it "moot"; and b) should Judge Edmonds recuse/disqualify herself from this matter?

Whether the District Court unreasonably denied Plaintiff's arguments regarding newly discovered evidence requiring reversal of prior dismissal and discovery, and whether the District Court erred in refusing to address a recusal motion and whether Judge Edmonds should recuse herself