No. 25-1142
Mark Zavislak v. Netflix, Inc.
Response Waived
Tags: claims-administration disclosure-requirements employee-benefits ERISA fiduciary-duty statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2026-05-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a contract that governs the administration of benefit claims is a "contract … under which the plan is established or operated" within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. § 1024(b)(4).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a contract that governs the administration of benefit claims is a 'contract … under which the plan is established or operated' within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. § 1024(b)(4)
Docket Entries
2026-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2026.
2026-04-07
Waiver of Netflix, Inc. of right to respond submitted.
2026-04-07
Waiver of right of respondent Netflix, Inc. to respond filed.
2026-03-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 1, 2026)
2026-01-20
Application (25A825) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 30, 2026.
2026-01-13
Application (25A825) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 29, 2026 to March 30, 2026, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Mark Zavislak
Oral Shane Balloun — Balloun Law Professional Corporation, Petitioner
Netflix, Inc.
Aaron Michael Streett — Baker Botts, L.L.P., Respondent