Whether mask-wearing constitutes symbolic or expressive speech, and whether an appeal regarding pandemic-related mask mandates is moot given potential future public health emergencies

1. Whether mask-wearing is symbolic or expressive speech. 2. Whether Petitioner ’s appeal is moot. 3. Given the cyclical nature of pandemics, the existence of international biological weaponry, and the courts ’ refusal to disavow its policy, whether there is a reasonable expectation that courts will implement mask-wearing requirements in the future. 4. Whether vacatur of order in interest of fairness is warranted.