1. Whether mask-wearing is symbolic or expressive speech.

2. Whether Petitioner's appeal is moot.

3. Given the cyclical nature of pandemics, the existence of international biological weaponry, and the courts' refusal to disavow its policy, whether there is a reasonable expectation that courts will implement mask-wearing requirements in the future.

4. Whether vacatur of order in interest of fairness is warranted.

Whether mask-wearing constitutes symbolic or expressive speech, and whether an appeal regarding pandemic-related mask mandates is moot given potential future public health emergencies