Wade Ryan Reeves v. Alisha May Reeves
1. Did the Supreme Court of Oklahoma violate
the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of
the Fourteenth Amendment by dismissing Mr.
Reeves 's appeal even though the appellate record
had not been filed or completed, and despite
receiving notice that sixteen designated items
were missing, thereby denying him meaningful
review of structural constitutional claims?
2. Did Oklahoma violate the Full Faith and
Credit Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment
by enforcing only portions of a California
judgment, disregarding the governing-law clause
and contractual terms contained in the Marital
Settlement Agreement, and issuing Oklahoma
orders inconsistent with the judgment as
written?
3. Did Oklahoma violate the Fourteenth
Amendment 's requirement of a lawfully
constituted tribunal by exercising judicial power
without determining its jurisdiction on the
record, denying Mr. Reeves any opportunity to
present evidence or testimony, and enforcing a
foreign judgment through a tribunal that never
established lawful authority to act?
Whether the Supreme Court of Oklahoma violated the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment by dismissing an appeal without a complete appellate record and denying meaningful review of structural constitutional claims, and whether Oklahoma violated the Full Faith and Credit Clause by enforcing only portions of a California judgment inconsistent with its terms