No. 25-120

Mark Gustafson, Individually and as Administrator and Personal Representative of the Estate of James Robert ("J.R.") Gustafson, et al. v. Springfield, Inc., dba Springfield Armory, et al.

Lower Court: Pennsylvania
Docketed: 2025-07-31
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: federalism gun-manufacturers interstate-commerce legislative-action state-sovereignty tenth-amendment
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-12-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Congress has violated federalism principles and the Tenth Amendment through the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) by restricting state court liability actions against gun manufacturers

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

are: 1. Has Congress violated federalism principles and the Tenth Amendment by invading a core structural element of State sovereignty when PLCAA bars a State from imposing liability on gun manufacturers and sellers in certain instances based on judicial determinations under the common law , but allow s identical liability actions if the State impose s liability through legislative determinations ? 2. Has Congress in PLCAA legitimately exercised its authority over interstate commerce when it does not regulate commercial activity of the firearms industry but prohibits state courts from authorizing liability for certain actions against gun manufacturers and sellers while refrain ing from the same prohibitions when a state legislature authorizes identical liability -inducing actions?

Docket Entries

2025-12-15
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/12/2025.
2025-11-24
Reply of petitioners Mark Gustafson, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2025-11-24
Reply of Mark Gustafson, et al. submitted.
2025-11-10
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2025-11-10
Brief of Federal Party in opposition submitted.
2025-11-07
Brief of respondents Springfield, Inc., d/b/a Springfield Armory, et al. in opposition filed.
2025-11-07
Brief of Springfield, Inc. d/b/a Springfield Armory, Saloom Department Store, and Saloom Department Store, LLC d/b/a Saloom Department Store in opposition submitted.
2025-10-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 10, 2025, for all respondents.
2025-10-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 31, 2025 to November 10, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-10-17
Motion of Federal Party for an extension of time submitted.
2025-09-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 31, 2025, for all respondents.
2025-09-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 2, 2025 to October 31, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-09-24
Motion of Federal Party for an extension of time submitted.
2025-08-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 2, 2025, for all respondents.
2025-08-07
Motion of the Solicitor General to extend the time to file a response from September 2, 2025 to October 2, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-08-07
Motion of Federal Party for an extension of time submitted.
2025-07-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 2, 2025)
2025-06-16
Application (24A1235) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until July 29, 2025.
2025-06-10
Application (24A1235) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 29, 2025 to July 29, 2025, submitted to Justice Alito.

Attorneys

Federal Party
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
Mark Gustafson, et al.
Robert S. PeckCenter for Constitutional Litigation, PC, Petitioner
Robert S. PeckCenter for Constitutional Litigation, PC, Petitioner
Saloom Department Store
Scott Charles AllanRenzulli Law Firm, LLP, Respondent
Saloom Department Store, LLC d/b/a Saloom Department Store
Scott Charles AllanRenzulli Law Firm, LLP, Respondent
Springfield, Inc. d/b/a Springfield Armory
Scott Charles AllanRenzulli Law Firm, LLP, Respondent
Scott Charles AllanRenzulli Law Firm, LLP, Respondent
Springfield, Inc. d/b/a Springfield Armory, Saloom Department Store, and Saloom Department Store, LLC d/b/a Saloom Department Store
Scott Charles AllanRenzulli Law Firm, LLP, Respondent