No. 25-135

Kelvin Fortenberry v. Esther Shack, et al.

Lower Court: Michigan
Docketed: 2025-08-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: None
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities Privacy
Latest Conference: 2026-01-09 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Why didn't Michigan check into the allegation of intimidation against me by the
court officer?

2. How can a judge ignore an objection made by a defendant and then use the basis
of this objection to rule against him while in fact violating three amendments.

3. Why wasn't fraud considered and reviewed by the court?

4. The Supremacy Clause states that federal law supersedes state and local laws.
How can Michigan courts use their statues or codes supersede Federal Court
case law when the U.S Supreme Court states that statues and codes are not
laws?

5. How can a judge be allowed to violate your constitutional and civil rights?

6. How can Family Court make a ruling on child support when the agency didn't
have jurisdiction?

7. Why did the Michigan courts ignore my right to challenge jurisdiction?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified.

Docket Entries

2026-01-12
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-11-06
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-10-14
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-24
Waiver of right of respondent Esther Shack, et al. to respond filed.
2025-09-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
2025-04-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 4, 2025)

Attorneys

Esther Shack, et al.
Lisa J. SchmidtSpeaker Law Firm, Respondent
Kelvin Fortenberry
Kelvin Fortenberry — Petitioner