No. 25-155

Gennady Y. Paremsky v. Ingham County, Michigan, et al.

Lower Court: Michigan
Docketed: 2025-08-08
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: compensation-rights constitutional-violations contract-impairment due-process equal-protection takings-clause
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Takings Securities Privacy
Latest Conference: 2025-10-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Michigan county officials violated the Takings Clause, Due Process, and Equal Protection Clauses by removing an employee's earned compensation without notice or hearing

Question Presented (from Petition)

I. Did Michigan Ingham County and its officials Greta Wu, Kim Coleman, Bruce Bragg, Leslie M. Shanlian, Jennifer Mack violate U.S. Const. amend. V, XIV Takings Clause, Due Process and Equal Protection clauses when they removed Petitioner's already earned 572 hours worth $22,656.92 from his personal payroll account and took it for public use without compensation, notice or hearing and while they paid for such already earned hours to other employees? II. Did the state officials Jill Hookey, Jason Koontz, and Jennifer Fields in their personal capacities violate Petitioner's constitutional due process and equal protection rights when they, contrary to their duties, refused to apply the state mandatory PTO payout guidelines to the Respondent ICMCF's PTO policy and relieved Respondent ICMCF from paying Petitioner his already earned and unpaid PTO of $26,241.63 when other similarly situated claimants routinely received unpaid PTO and there was no rational basis not to require pay of the already earned compensation to Petitioner? III. Did the Michigan courts violate the U.S. Const. Article I, Section 10 Contract clause when they impaired Respondent ICMCF's obligation of the implied/oral PTO contract with Petitioner by relieving Respondent ICMCF from paying Petitioner his already earned PTO compensation pursuant to his oral/implied agreement with County Respondents? IV. Did the Michigan judges and the state officials Jill Hookey, Jason Koontz, and Jennifer ii Fields in their personal capacities enable theft of earnings of $26,241.63 and tax evasion scheme by which Employer failed to report such earnings and pay $4,014.96 FICA taxes on them, which resulted in Respondent ICMCF's violations of not only state laws, but also federal laws of Social Security, IRS, and the RICO1 Act?

Docket Entries

2025-10-14
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
2025-08-26
Waiver of right of respondents Jennifer Fields, Jill Hookey, and Jason Koontz to respond filed.
2025-06-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 8, 2025)

Attorneys

Gennady Paremsky
Elena A. ParemskyAttorney at Law, Petitioner
Elena A. ParemskyAttorney at Law, Petitioner
Jennifer Fields, Jill Hookey, and Jason Koontz
Ann Maurine ShermanMichigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Ann Maurine ShermanMichigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent