No. 25-171

Dimetri Alexander Smith v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-08-13
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: criminal-prosecution enterprise-structure legal-distinction procedural-requirement racketeering statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
TradeSecret
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the enterprise structure need to be distinct from that inherent in the racketeering activity alleged?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

In a prosecution for racketeering related offenses, does the enterprise structure need to be distinct from that inherent in the racketeering activity alleged?

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-20
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
Main Document
2025-08-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2025-07-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 12, 2025)
PetitionAppendixAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of ServiceProof of Service

Attorneys

Dimetri Smith
William Breedlove — Breedlove Legal LLC, Petitioner
William Breedlove — Breedlove Legal LLC, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent