No. 25-175

In Re Andy Desty

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2025-08-13
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (2)
Tags: administrative-law child-support constitutional-rights due-process judicial-power separation-of-powers
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity DueProcess Securities Privacy
Latest Conference: 2026-01-09 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Georgia Department of Human Services/Child Support Services violated constitutional due process rights through administrative hearings and child support enforcement mechanisms

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1. Has the authority and ruling of the Supreme Court case between Holmberg v. Holmberg, 588 N.W.2d 720 (Minn. 1999), to stop Corporation ’s child support slavery, process, agreements, program, payment obligations like Georgia Department of Human Services/Child Support Services ’ Administrative Hearings Child Support hearing process in their unconstitutional delegation of judicial power to an Executive Branch agency, been extinguished pursuant to Article 1 Delegation of Legislative Power § 1, because of a U.S. District Court ’s Judgment or Opinion and Order? 2. Has the authority and ruling in the United States Supreme Court case between NODD v. Shalala, No. 95’1741, overruled by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division ’s judgment or decision interpretating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, permit Georgia Department of Human Services/Child Support Services ’ use of deprivation of rights and property without due process of law decisions? 3. Does Georgia Department of Human Services/Child Support Services possess a federal due process right over all natural men and women on this land to gain or acquire validation of abusive power from courts to detriment the souls of the American people by violating Separation of Powers Doctrine to build security interest pursuant to U.S. Const. Amend. V and XIV? 4. Does the holding of Penhallow v. Doane ’s Administrators, 3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54 (1795), render Georgia Department of Human Services/Child Support Services corporate jurisdiction over a natural man? 5. Can a natural person be forced into a contract without his consent? 6. Are Georgia Department of Human Services/Child Support Services with Dun & Bradstreet numbers 043583728, 052512596 and the State of Georgia with EIN 58’0973190 the same corporation? 7. Do magistrate judges, District judges, and Circuit judges have the authority to preside over U.S. Supreme Court ’s rulings and decisions permit district and appellate courts to provide absolute immunity to the wrongdoers? 8. Can a state or a corporation working under its own authority forcing a bill of attainder on a natural person to force him into slavery? 9. Can a corporation interfere with a natural man ’s private affairs and report his private affairs to another corporation without his consent whatsoever pursuant to 5 U.S. C. § 552a (b)? 10. Can the authority and ruling in the U.S. Supreme Court case between U.S. v. Sage, 92 F.3D 101 (2D CIR 1996), be extinguished by a U.S. District Court ’s Judgment or Opinion and Order? Order? 11. Can district and circuit judges violate the U.S. Constitution, its Supreme Court ’s rulings and decisions, and federal laws, and refuse Due Process and Equal Protection pursuant to Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 483 n. 35, 96 S. Ct. 3037, 49 L.? 12. Can a U.S. Court of Appeals give an instruction, or a ruling or an order to an Appellee to follow where the Appellee failed to follow such order, and later, the same court ruled in favor of that same Appellee?

Docket Entries

2026-01-12
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-12-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-11-07
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-10-14
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
2025-06-25
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due September 12, 2025)

Attorneys

Desty, In Re
Andy Desty — Petitioner
Andy Desty — Petitioner