Whether federal courts can create federal common law on judicial immunity and student loan bankruptcy remedies in violation of separation of powers, and whether judicial actors are immune from First Amendment retaliation claims

1. Can federal courts, consistent with the Consti tution, assume legislative authority by creating fed eral common law on judicial immunity, filing re strictions, or student loan bankruptcy remedies, vio lating separation of powers under Egbert v. Boule, 142 S. Ct. 1793 (2022) when upholding the unconsti tutionally vague 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(8) and the uncon stitutional Department of Education? 2. Do actions by Chief Judge Bumb, Judge Sanchez, Judge Vazquez, and others, including dis missing complaints, restricting filings, upholding non-statutory bankruptcy remedies, and modifying supervised release, constitute First Amendment re taliation by limiting court access and punishing peti tioner ’s challenges to illegal student loan collection and the Department of Education ’s authority? 3. Are judicial actors and probation officers im mune when engaging in legislative, enforcement, or administrative acts, such as applying the Brunner test {Brunner v. New York State Higher Education Services Corp., 831 F.2d 395 (2d Cir. 1987)), retaliat ing against First Amendment activities, or censoring evidence to protect the unconstitutional enforcement of § 523(a)(8) and the Department of Education? i List of All