Whether a reviewing court lacks jurisdiction over a district court's determination of imminent danger in a qualified immunity analysis, and whether the Tenth Circuit improperly denied qualified immunity without clearly established law

are: 1. Whether , when conducting an objective reasonableness analysis to determine if an officer is entitled to qualified immunity, a reviewing court lacks jurisdiction over a district court’s determination s ii regarding imminent danger because imminent danger is a question of fact rather than a question of law. 2. Whether the Tenth Circuit departed from this Court’s decision s in cases like Kisela v. Hughes , 584 U.S. 100 (2018) (per curiam) , by denying qualified immunity despite the lack of clearly established law imposing liability in analogous circumstances ?