No. 25-217
CeramTec GmbH v. CoorsTek Bioceramics LLC, fka C5 Medical Werks, LLC
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: design-functionality evidence-standard intellectual-property product-design trademark-law utility-patent
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Patent Trademark JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw Patent Trademark JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a utility patent that produces a product with multiple designs constitutes 'strong evidence' that every design aspect is functional under TrafFix Devices precedent
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether under this Court’s decision in TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc. , 532 U.S. 23 (2001), a utility patent that produces a product with a wide array of designs is “strong evidence” that every aspect of every design produced by practicing the patent is functional rather than arbitrary, incidental, or ornamental.
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-09-08
Waiver of CoorsTek Bioceramics LLC of right to respond submitted.
2025-09-08
Waiver of right of respondent CoorsTek Bioceramics LLC to respond filed.
2025-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 22, 2025)
2025-06-25
Application (24A1236) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until August 20, 2025.
2025-06-11
Application (24A1236) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 21, 2025 to August 20, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
CeramTec GmbH
Jessica Lynn Ellsworth — Hogan Lovells US, LLP, Petitioner
Jessica Lynn Ellsworth — Hogan Lovells US, LLP, Petitioner
CoorsTek Bioceramics LLC
Steven Joseph Horowitz — Sidley Austin LLP, Respondent
Steven Joseph Horowitz — Sidley Austin LLP, Respondent