No. 25-224
Bernard Gelb v. Preston Niblack, Individually and as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Finance, et al.
Tags: due-process fourteenth-amendment notice-requirement property-rights takings-clause unclaimed-funds
Latest Conference:
2025-11-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Respondents taking $500 million dollars without sending any notice to the Owners violate the Due Process Clause of the of the Fourteenth Amendment and this Court's precedents?
2. Did the Respondents taking $500 million dollars without paying just compensation to the Owners violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment and this Court's precedents?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Respondents taking $500 million dollars without sending any notice to the Owners violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and this Court's precedents?
Docket Entries
2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-08-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 25, 2025)
Attorneys
Bernard Gelb
Bernard Gelb — Petitioner