No. 25-232

King Vanga v. Priscilla N. Juarez, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2025-08-28
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: constitutional-law defamation false-statement first-amendment opinion-speech third-party-attribution
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference: 2025-11-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the First Amendment protects a verifiably false factual statement as an opinion based on disclosed facts simply because the statement republished information from a third party and attributed the falsehood to that third party?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Whether the First Amendment protects a verifiably false factual statement as an opinion based on disclosed facts simply because the statement republished infor mation from a third party an d attributed the falsehood to that third party?

Docket Entries

2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-08-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 29, 2025)

Attorneys

King Vanga
Jeffrey Michael RosenfeldKronenberger Rosenfeld, LLP, Petitioner
Jeffrey Michael RosenfeldKronenberger Rosenfeld, LLP, Petitioner