Whether the forcible seizure and alteration of a VA-backed home during pending federal bankruptcy and appellate proceedings violated the Supremacy Clause and Due Process by nullifying federal courts' exclusive jurisdiction over estate property

1. Whether the forcible seizure and alteration of a VAbacked home, while federal bankruptcy and appellate proceedings were pending, violated the Supremacy Clause and Due Process by nullifying the federal courts ’ exclusive jurisdiction over estate property, 28 U.S.C. § 1334(e)(1); 11 U.S.C. §§ 362(a), 541(a). 2. Whether courts may enforce an alleged debt, authorize eviction, or impose contempt without debt validation under federal law, including the 15 U.S.C. § 1692g, and without affording a hearing to contest it. 3. Whether a deed holder may be removed from property absent an adjudication of title or hearing in equity, and whether doing so via state summary process during active federal jurisdiction constitutes an unconstitutional taking and denial of due process. 4. Whether Article III courts violate constitutional duties by refusing to review jurisdictional defects and federal statutory violations, thereby allowing irreparable harm to proceed unchecked. 5. Whether resolving complex constitutional and statutory issues by summary procedures, without discovery, evidentiary hearing, or factual findings, violates due process. 6. Whether pro se litigants are denied the adversarial right secured by the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments when dispositive orders, sanctions, and contempt issue without a meaningful opportunity to be heard and to challenge opposing claims