No. 25-241

Jason Arthur Aho v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2025-08-29
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: evidence-suppression fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment ineffective-assistance sixth-amendment strickland-standard
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the trial court's summary denial of Petitioner's ineffective assistance of counsel claims without an evidentiary hearing violates constitutional protections and misapplies Strickland v. Washington

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

I. Whether the trial court’s summary denial of Petitioner’s facially sufficient ineffective assistance of counsel claim without an evidentiary hearing —alleging counsel’s failure to move to suppress evidence from an allegedly unlawful traffic stop, search, and seizure — violate the Fourth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment and misapply Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984) . II. Whether the trial court's summary denial of Petitioner's ineffective assistance of counsel claim, without conducting an evidentiary hearing, violate the Fourth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment, where the claim asserts that trial counsel failed to seek suppression of evidence from an unlawful vehicle search lacking probable cause, contrary to Arizona v. Gant , 556 U.S. 332 (2009) .

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-09-08
Waiver of State of Florida of right to respond submitted.
2025-09-08
Waiver of right of respondent State of Florida to respond filed.
2025-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 29, 2025)

Attorneys

Jason Arthur Aho
Rook Elizabeth RingerThe Law Offce of Rook Ringer, Petitioner
Rook Elizabeth RingerThe Law Offce of Rook Ringer, Petitioner
State of Florida
Marilyn Frances MuirOffice of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Respondent
Marilyn Frances MuirOffice of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Respondent