No. 25-276

Bret Healy v. Supreme Court of South Dakota, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-09-10
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-procedure legal-standard non-signing-party reasonable-inquiry rule-11 sanctions
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2025-11-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 permits sanctions to be imposed on represented parties who do not sign the pleading, motion, or other paper at issue based on an objective standard of reasonable inquiry

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 permits a court to sanction represented parties for violations of that rule. In Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Comm unications Ente rprises , Inc. , 498 U.S. 533 (1991) , this Court held that “ Rule 11 imposes an objective standard of reasonable inquiry on represented parties who sign papers or pleadings .” Id. at 934 –35. But this Court expressly left open “ whether or under what circumstances a nonsigning party may be sanctioned.” Id. at 935 (emphasis added) . The courts of appeals are in an acknowledged split on that still-open question. Two circuits hold represented, nonsigning parties to an objective standard of reasonable inquiry —i.e., negligence . On the other hand, at least five circuits require a more stringent showing —that the represented, nonsigning party have had actual knowledge of the wrongful conduct or took affirmative action that caused the violation . The question presented is: Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 permits sanctions to be imposed on represented parties who do not sign the pleading, motion, or other paper at issue based on an objective standard of reasonable inquiry .

Docket Entries

2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-09-13
Waiver of right of respondent Mary Ann Osborne to respond filed.
2025-09-11
Waiver of right of respondent Supreme Court of South Dakota, et al. to respond filed.
2025-09-11
Waiver of right of respondents Albert Steven Fox to respond filed.
2025-09-11
Waiver of Janine Kern, Mark Salter, Jon Sogn, Patricia Devaney, Scott Myren, Steven Jensen of right to respond submitted.
2025-09-11
Waiver of right of respondents Janine Kern, Mark Salter, Jon Sogn, Patricia Devaney, Scott Myren, Steven Jensen to respond filed.
2025-09-11
Waiver of right of respondents Healy Ranch, Inc., Barry Healy, Bryce Healy, Larry Mines, Sheila Mines to respond filed.
2025-09-10
Waiver of Brief in Opposition to Petition for a Writ of Certiorari of Supreme Court of South Dakota, et al. submitted.
2025-09-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 10, 2025)
2025-07-01
Application (25A1) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until September 6, 2025.
2025-06-27
Application (25A1) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 7, 2025 to September 6, 2025, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.

Attorneys

Albert Steven Fox
Daniel Francis DuffyBangs, McCullen, Butler, Foye & Simmons, LLP, Respondent
Daniel Francis DuffyBangs, McCullen, Butler, Foye & Simmons, LLP, Respondent
Bret Healy
Daniel Martin SullivanHolwell Shuster & Goldberg LLP, Petitioner
Daniel Martin SullivanHolwell Shuster & Goldberg LLP, Petitioner
Healy Ranch, Inc., Barry Healy, Bryce Healy, Larry Mines, Sheila Mines
Lee SchoenbeckSchoenbeck & Erickson, P.C., Respondent
Lee SchoenbeckSchoenbeck & Erickson, P.C., Respondent
Janine Kern, Mark Salter, Jon Sogn, Patricia Devaney, Scott Myren, Steven Jensen
Robert B. AndersonMay, Adam, Gerdes & Thompson, Respondent
Robert B. AndersonMay, Adam, Gerdes & Thompson, Respondent
Mary Ann Osborne
Zachary W. PetersonRichardson, Wyly, Wise, Sauck & Hieb, LLP, Respondent
Zachary W. PetersonRichardson, Wyly, Wise, Sauck & Hieb, LLP, Respondent
Supreme Court of South Dakota, et al.
Paul S. SwedlundSouth Dakota Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Paul S. SwedlundSouth Dakota Office of the Attorney General, Respondent