Whether a District Court erred in disqualifying counsel of choice in a civil defamation case for violating a protective order by reporting potential criminal activity to law enforcement, and whether such disqualification violates the petitioner's Fifth Amendment due process rights

Petitioner / Appellant , Dr. Patrick Byrne , seeks review of the Order of the Circuit Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, dismissing his appeal and refusing to review a District Court order disqualifying his counsel of choice in this defamation case brought by Respondent , U.S. Dominion , Inc., et al., and its multiple affiliated and international companies , seeking hundreds of millions of dollars from Petitioner. The questions presented for review are: 1. In a civil defamation case where a discovery protective order is filed to shelter evidence of crim es, does a District Court err in affirming the disqualification of Petitioner ’s counsel of choice for violating the protective order, where she was obligated by state statute (MCL 750.149) to report criminal activity found in the discovery documents to law enforcement ? 2. Where a civil litigant's right to retain counsel is rooted in Fifth Amendment notions of due process, w as it a violation of Petitioner ’s constitutional rights for the District Court to disqualify his counsel of choice and for the Court of Appeals to refuse to hear this substantive and directly impactful ruling on jurisdictional grounds ? See, e.g., Potashnick v. Port City Constr. Co., 609 F.2d 1101, 1118 (5th Cir. 1980); Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 68, 53 S. Ct. 55, 77 L. Ed. 158 (1932) ; Guajardo -Palma v. Martinson , 622 F.3d 801, 803 (7th Cir. 2010) .