No. 25-30

Marvin Keith Stitt v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2025-07-09
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: congressional-authority criminal-jurisdiction criminal-procedure indian-country indian-law tribal-sovereignty
Key Terms:
Privacy Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a state may exercise criminal jurisdiction over an Indian for conduct in Indian country absent a valid congressional grant of authority

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Whether a state may exercise criminal jurisdiction over an Indian for conduct in Indian country absent a valid congressional grant of authority.

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-22
Reply of Marvin Keith Stitt submitted.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2025-08-22
Reply of petitioner Marvin Keith Stitt filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2025-08-08
Brief of City of Tulsa, Oklahoma in opposition submitted.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceMain DocumentCertificate of Word Count
2025-08-08
Brief of respondent City of Tulsa, Oklahoma in opposition filed.
Proof of ServiceMain DocumentCertificate of Word Count
2025-08-08
Brief of respondent Tulsa, Oklahoma in opposition filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2025-07-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 8, 2025)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of ServicePetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

City of Tulsa, Oklahoma
Jack Christopher Blair — City of Tulsa, Respondent
Jack Christopher Blair — City of Tulsa, Respondent
Marvin Keith Stitt
Brett Allen Chapman — Brett A. Chapman, Attorney at Law PLLC, Petitioner
Brett Allen Chapman — Brett A. Chapman, Attorney at Law PLLC, Petitioner