No. 25-31
Benjamin Adams v. Lloyd Arnold, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Correction, et al.
Tags: disciplinary-segregation due-process incarceration liberty-deprivation wilkinson-v-austin wolff-v-mcdonnell
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2025-10-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether incarcerated individuals facing disciplinary segregation are entitled to adversarial or non-adversarial due process protections
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
The Question Presented is whether incarcerated individuals facing disciplinary segregation that amounts to a deprivation of liberty are entitled the adversarial due process protections described in Wolff v. McDonnell , 418 U.S. 539 (1974), or merely the non adversarial due process protections described in Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. 209 (2005) .
Docket Entries
2025-10-14
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
2025-09-23
Reply of Benjamin Adams submitted.
2025-09-23
Reply of petitioner Benjamin Adams filed. (Distributed)
2025-09-05
Brief of Lloyd Arnold, Joshua Peltier, Charles A. Penfold, and Clinton Feldkamp in opposition submitted.
2025-09-05
Brief of respondents Lloyd Arnold, et al. in opposition filed.
2025-07-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 5, 2025, for all respondents.
2025-07-21
Motion of Lloyd Arnold, Joshua Peltier, Charles A. Penfold, and Clinton Feldkamp for an extension of time submitted.
2025-07-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 8, 2025 to September 5, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-07-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 8, 2025)
2025-03-31
Application (24A939) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until July 7, 2025.
2025-03-27
Application (24A939) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 8, 2025 to July 7, 2025, submitted to Justice Barrett.
Attorneys
Benjamin Adams
Amanda Kelly Rice — Jones Day, Petitioner
Lloyd Arnold, Joshua Peltier, Charles A. Penfold, and Clinton Feldkamp
James Allen Barta — Office of the Indiana Attorney General, Respondent