Whether a state court's denial of meaningful appellate review based on an absent transcript violates due process under the Fourteenth Amendment

1. Whether a state court's denial of meaningful appellate review, based on the absence of a transcript that the court itself suppressed or failed to provide, violates a litigant's right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. 2. Whether a pro se litigant who is also a sworn federal law enforcement officer is entitled to heightened judicial protection when asserting claims of judicial misconduct and suppression of constitutional rights under color of law. 3. Whether a state appellate court may affirm a lower court judgment while knowingly excluding critical portions of the trial record, thereby foreclosing meaningful review and access to justice. 4. Whether a pattern of judicial actions that obstruct access to the record, deny motions for supplementation, and affirm on incomplete records amounts to a conspiracy to deprive constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242. Pgi